This month marks Colorado Lawyer’s 50th year in print. To reflect on how much has changed—and how much has stayed the same—we’re looking back at some of our most memorable articles. Today, we deliver some classic writing advice from esteemed DU Law Professor K.K. DuVivier, a.k.a. The Scrivener. Her entire catalog of articles merits a re-read, but we’ve narrowed it down to a pair of articles sure to make your writing more fleet of foot: Power Verbs and Verb-Based Writing. Click here to see all the throwback articles.
“Some of our people write horribly. Can you come give a talk to teach them how to write well?” This invitation is one that law firms and professional groups often extend, and it raises for me a recurring dilemma. Writing takes constant practice, attention, and vigilance, so the pursuit of lucid writing must be a lifetime commitment. Many habits form in childhood, and change can be painfully incremental.1 What can I say in one sitting that would make any difference?
A colleague, who has devoted most of his career to legal writing, has developed an excellent solution. In a recent talk at the University of Denver College of Law,2 C. Edward Good, author3 and “writer in residence” at a law firm,4 delivered a one-hour talk teaching our students that the most efficient way to improve writing is by developing “verb-based style.”
Step One—Ferret Out the Verb
The single most important word in most English sentences is the verb.5 Every sentence must have at least one verb, and if a sentence consists of only one word, that word is usually a verb (for example, “Come.” or “Look.”). Good advises grabbing a marker to search for the most troublesome verb in the English language, the verb “to be.” Read through your writing and highlight each time you use one of the following forms of the verb: “am, is, was, are, were, be, been, being.” Good uses the following examples of how “to be” often crops up.
As a Conjugated Verb
- The SEC (subject) was (form of the verb “to be”) the first agency (subject complement or predicate nominative) to address the issue.
- The agencies (subject) were (form of “to be”) instrumental (predicate adjective) in reducing passengers’ injuries.
- The law firm (subject) is (form of “to be”) near the Metro station (adverb or adverbial phrase).
As a Helping Verb
- Progressive Tense = Be + “ing” verb (present participle): We are studying effective writing.
- Passive Voice = Be + “ed” verb (past participle): The issue was decided by the agency. (Note that many past participles do not end in “ed”: The movie was shown by John.)
Step Two—Revise to Eliminate the Verb “To Be”
The verb “to be” saps the energy from your sentences. It shifts attention away from the actor and the action. A new language called “E-prime” strives to eliminate “to be” in all writing and speaking.6 Good outlines the following strategies for doing just that. Show “being” through “doing.”
- Example: When you get rid of the verb to be, your writing will be better.
- Revision: When you get rid of the verb to be, your writing will improve.
Find an actor.7
- Example: There are few cases that have been decided on this set of facts.
- Revision: Only a few courts have decided cases on this set of facts.
Edit out “nouniness” or “nominalizations.”8
- Example: It was the court’s belief that proof of his guilt was not possible.
- Revision: The court believed no one could possibly prove his guilt.
Use intransitive verbs to show movement or location.
- Example: She was still on the street corner.
- Revision: She remained on the street corner.
Use linking verbs.
- Example: A diagram showing the plan is attached as Exhibit B.
- Revision: A diagram showing the plan appears as Exhibit B.
Step Three—Watch Out for “There is” and “There are”
“It is,” “there is,” or “there are” clauses are expletives and often clutter a sentence because they serve as surrogates for the noun in the subject position. Good first advises to eliminate them: “Expletive deleted.” However, Good alerts his audience to some common mistakes that arise when you do use them.
Watch for agreement in number.
- Example: There is too many mistakes going on.
- Revision: There are too many mistakes going on. (The verb should be plural if “mistakes,” the noun following the expletive, is plural.)
Watch for that clauses.
- Example: It is the belief of the Board that this policy is an impediment to successful completion of the project.
- Revision: The Board believes this policy impedes successful completion of the project.
Writing is difficult, and most of us must work hard to improve. Words cannot substitute for the hard work, but sometimes they can have an impact by revolutionizing our perspective. Transform your writing by making a single change: convert to verb-based style.
1. DuVivier, “Nothing So Destructive As Habit,” 26 The Colorado Lawyer 41 (Jan. 1997).
2. A video of the presentation is available at http://www.law.du.edu/ lawproc/tutorials.htm.
3. See Good, A Grammar Book for You and I . . . Oops, Me! (Herndon, VA: Capital Books 2002); Good is the developer of Lawmanac, the trademark for the clickable help system for legal writers by C 2003 Grammar.com. For information on site licenses, visit http://www. Grammar.com.
4. Good’s title is “Counsel & Writer-in-Residence” for the intellectual property law firm of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, in Washington, D.C. (firstname.lastname@example.org).
5. DuVivier, “Power Verbs,” 22 The Colorado Lawyer 2369 (Nov. 1993).
6. See http://www.generalsemantics.org/Articles/E-Prime_intro.htm. See also Murphey, “To Be in Their Bonnets,” Atlantic Monthly (Feb. 1992).
7. For more on eliminating the passive voice, see DuVivier, “Problems With the Passive Voice,” 24 The Colorado Lawyer 545 (March 1995).
8. Nominalizations are nouns with verb roots, such as agreement (for agree) or assumption (for assume). For more on eliminating these, see DuVivier, supra note 5.