Menu icon Access the Business Officer Magazine menu by clicking or touching here.
Colorado Lawyer Magazine logo, click or touch this logo to return to the homepage Click or touch the Colorado Lawyer Magazine logo to return to the homepage. Search

Garcia v. Colorado Cab Co.

2020 CO 55. No. 19SC116. Torts—Negligence—Rescue Doctrine.

June 15, 2020

In this case, the Supreme Court considered what is required for a person to qualify as a “rescuer” under the rescue doctrine. The Court held that to qualify as a rescuer, an individual must have intended to aid or rescue a person whom he or she reasonably believed was in imminent peril, and acted in such a way that could have reasonably succeeded or did succeed in preventing or alleviating such peril. Applying this test to the facts of this case, the Court concluded that plaintiff qualified as a rescuer under the rescue doctrine. Because the Court of Appeals concluded that plaintiff did not qualify as a rescuer because he did not physically intervene, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case to that Court to address the remaining issues raised on appeal.

Official Colorado Supreme Court proceedings can be found at the Colorado Supreme Court website.

Related Topics

Torts, Negligence, Rescue Doctrine

Back to the From the Courts Page