Waugh v. Veith.
No. 24CA0741. Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights—Costs Awards to Defendants—Required Finding of Frivolousness—General Rule Allowing Prevailing Defendants to Recover Reasonable Costs.
April 24, 2025
A protest occurred in August 2020 during which Officers Veith and Anderson used force against Waugh. Waugh sued the officers under CRS § 13-21-131 for excessive force, violations of free speech rights, and retaliation. On Waugh’s free speech and retaliation claims, the district court granted summary judgment to the officers. A jury returned a verdict for the officers on Waugh’s excessive force claim. The officers then moved for an award of costs under CRS § 13-16-105 and CRCP 54(d) but did not argue that any of Waugh’s claims were frivolous. The district court awarded the officers $12,835.14 in costs against Waugh under CRS § 13-16-105 and CRCP 54(d) without finding that any of Waugh’s claims were frivolous, reasoning that § 13-21-131(3) did not limit recovery of costs to a prevailing defendant under § 13-16-105 and Rule 54(d).
On appeal, Waugh argued that the district court erred by awarding the officers costs without finding that any of his claims were frivolous. Subsection 13-21-131(3) provides that when a judgment is entered for a defendant, the court may award the defendant reasonable costs and attorney fees for defending a claim that the court finds frivolous. The court of appeals concluded that § 13-21-131(3) conflicts with § 13-16-105’s mandate that costs be awarded to a prevailing defendant and determined that because § 13-21-131(3) is part of a more specific and recent statute than § 13-16-105, subsection (3) controls defense costs awards in actions brought under § 13-21-131. Accordingly, the district court erred by determining that there was no conflict between subsection (3) and the general rule that allows prevailing defendants to recover reasonable costs under § 13-16-105 and Rule 54(d), and by awarding the officers their costs without finding that Waugh’s claims were frivolous.
That portion of the order awarding $12,835.14 in costs against Waugh was reversed.